Analysis of Precarious Financial Condition of Local Bodies
Parul Ratra *
Department of Economics, M.D. University, Rohtak, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper uses a federal framework to use the data from current trends in assessing a general edge. Reddy [1] revealed in their study entitled Upholding Fiscal federalism using TOR {Terms of Reference} of 15th FC {Finance Commission} with change in the economic/ fiscal federal structure leads to cooperation with stability in federalism. Data is taken from RBI reports, finance accounts, State Finance Commission {SFC} &Centre Finance Commission {CFC} reports, National Institute of Public finance {NIPFP}, etc. This paper further evaluates and analyses significant issues related to the financial flows to Local bodies through Grants in Aid contributions by the Centre and the States. Also, examine the interstate difference in Grants in Aid contribution. We review the initial state govt. Issues & finances are based on the various sources of funds for local bodies. It examines income efforts & essential sectoral outlay. We used to determine whether the contributions made to local bodies are sufficient to carry out their responsibilities that showed are properly exercised to ensure the improvement. In specific, the fiscal power capable of the Panchayati Raj Institutions, common questions rationalization subjects in the devolution of power, thereby, a platform only for academic dialogue. State’s assessment in terms of states performance-based, both Centre-state has fiscal Profligacy with Terms of reference {TOR} In the 15th Finance Commission {FC} but the 14th finance commission described that Panchayat’s own-source proceeds are very diminutive, mostly reliant on shifting state and central government resources. The achievement of decentralization depends upon the revenue strengthening of the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs). Whether the differences between Grants in Aid provided to Rural Local Bodies and Urban Local Bodies through the lens of the recommendations of the Fifteenth Finance Commission, therefore, the first step in strengthening them requires greater financial resources for local bodies.
Keywords: Dermatoglyphics, Local bodies, Finger prints and Leukaemia, fifteenth finance commission, state finances, centrally sponsored schemes
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Reddy GR. Upholding fiscal federalism: terms of references of the fifteenth finance commission. Economic and Political Weekly. 2018;53(10):19-21.
Rao MG. Central transfers to states in India: rewarding performance while ensuring equity. Final report submitted to NITI Aayog; 2017.
Olson, 1965 & 1972. The logic of Collective Action, Public Goods and The Theory of Groups.
RBI. State Finances: A Study of Budgets of 2019–20, Reserve Bank of India; 2019.
Gayam A, Khullar V. State of State Finances. PRS Legislative Research); 2018.
Oommen MA. Have the State Finance Commissions fulfilled their constitutional mandates, Economic & Political Weekly. 2010;XLV(30):39-44.
Chaudhuri A. Financing capital investment in infrastructure constraints in markets by ULB. Economic and Political Weekly. 2007;36(4):2873-2879.
Available:http://www.worldbank.org/urban/led{World Bank 2000-2001.
Government of India. Report of the Reforms Committee. Raja J. Chelliah Chairman. New Delhi: Working Government of India; 2001.
Dreze J, Sen A. India: Economic development and social opportunity. Oxford University Press Catalogue. 1999; 11:2873-28797.
Oommen MA. Fiscal Decentralisation to Local Governments in India. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, UK; 2008.
Srivastava TN. Local 'Self' Government and the Constitution. Economic and Political Weekly. 2002;37(3):3190-319.
Mohapatra BP. Local self-governing institutions in India and fiscal decentralization: Issues, challenges and policy prescriptions. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2012; 1(6):41-48.
Mohapatra BP. Institutions, Democratic Decentralization and Human Development in India, from Fiscal Constraint to Political Control (Under Publication); 2012.
Chakraborty P, Gupta M, Chakraborty L, Kaur. A. Analysis of State Budgets 2017-18: Emerging Issues; 2018.
Boex J. Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental finance reform as an international development strategy. Urban Institute Centre on International Development and Governance, Working Paper 2009-06; 2009.
Fernandes A. Aggrandiser Government and Local Governance. Economic and Political Weekly, JSTOR. 2003;38(27): 2873-2879.
Johnson C. Decentralization in India: poverty, politics and Panchayati Raj. London: Overseas Development Institute, Working Paper. 2003;199.
Mathew G. Status of Panchayati Raj in the States & Union Territories of India, New Delhi, Institute of Social Sciences in assoc. with Concept. Asia-Pacific Journal of Rural Development. 2000;24(2).
Marjit S. Decentralized financing, governance & public-private cooperation. Economic & Political Weekly. 1999; 34(20):1197-1201. Available:https://www.jstor.org/stable/i398582
Oommen MA. Fiscal Decentralization to the sub-state level governments. Economic and Political Weekly. 2006;897- 903.